Okay, I agree with it
good you realize how stupid this is
but staff should take action against it
oh nvm you dont, but ok
if it clearly is an unreasonable vote.
so now this, this is much more complex than you imagine my dude
that word, reason, it generates so much conflict within this, mostly because of how ambiguous the metaphysical idealized transcedental concepts behind it are
so according to the oxford dictionary, there are a few most common meanings for it
A cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.
that is how you are using it, UN REASON ABLE, it is unable to reason(for it), or
The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgements logically. which would act as a verb
but now we fall into a big discussion, should map making rates follow reason? and by that, thinking? because not all human actions are done by reason, some are by feeling, and if i feel that something is good, or i feel like something is beautiful, is that not valid from your point of view? but then we fall into another big problem which is, reason... we kind of feel that reason is the way to go, or achieving or objectives in the most efficient way is the way to go and we use reason towards it, but we still feel, and the amount of conflict generates by all of this is absurd
buuuut since youre probably using it coming from the first meaning, it still has problems
A cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.
what defines a valid cause? does it need to follow reason or rationality? but then staff doesnt really understand logical fallacies enought to understand what is and what is not and hell it even falls into the case i mentioned before, what is a valid justification? what our arbitrary staff thinks is, but it falls on a big problem which is, staff changes, so lets say zap approves stryde-sniper4, oh wait zap left, tempus looks at it and hes not that active so he did not see it being approved, NOT APPROVED, or it can generate a case where many staff members are involved and then some agree and some disagree, if it is a 2 vs 2 case the highest rank wins because of simply power, but what if it is like all admins vs all moderators? what is right? there are more moderators so... democracy? well it doesnt mean it is right or wrong based on logic itself, and well argumentum ad populum exists and its a fallacy for a reason
reason in the case of explanation implies what i already mentioned before
so what can we achieve out of this? it doesnt matter if it has a reasoning behind it, if you empirically enjoy a song, you would need to explain why, most people dont know why and just say "oh its nice" and there is no problem with that, someone who has knowledge on how the brain works would use an argument that explains how the brain processes it, while one with knowledge of music theory is going to explain the correlation betwen the notes but coming of a base that doesnt define what is good or bad(depends on the era culture specific kind of thinking etc) and it generated conflict even there, but what if your brain is different? that means he needs to study you? AND WHY WOULDNT IT APPLY TOWARDS MAP MAKING?
god this is too big nobody is reading this but i think those who do will understand what im saying
ECC9 And Wazzasski Rated one because they wanted to annoy me and destroy my LDr.
and why is that invalid? lets say you really like pb2 maps, and youre making a (according to your opinion) cool-sexy map, then someone you dislike makes a (according to the public opinion) better map, you will probably dislike it out of feelings of envy or something, why is that invalid? because it isnt objective i imagine, well beauty isnt, the experience one has also isnt, reality also isnt, we kind of assume it is for a few things such as science, but is art science? Hegel would like to talk to you - Lectures on Aesthetics - well, if we dont consider experience and try to set an absolute thing, in the future the common sense of what is a good pb2 map will change like it has in the past and it will, should we update it? but it always changes, so lets set a arbitrary period of time? but what if someone wants a map approved a few days before the change of the rules? i mean this is obviously not realistic at all and staff wouldnt do it as eric wouldnt approve it n etc n etc
so the best thing that can come out of this is that "eric owns the game and he says what is good or bad" but we are the ones that keep the gaming rule like pure supply and demand, who is right? its erics property, but he does it... for us? actually eric does it for himself and probably to make kids happy n etc, he doesnt make much money out of pb2, and it also falls into a problem, if that is the case and the community agrees that eric sets it, is eric still doing what the community says should be done, because eric is making the decision, not the community, at least after that
so i dont think much can come out of this, would find it interesting if someone has cool-sexy arguments
and even then what is the problem with lowering your LDR rank if it is supposed to show who is good and who is bad? maybe they dont want you to look good because they simply think you are not, and the proof thing well it is more complex than that
I even provided proof publically.
now big big problems, why is revenge not valid, isnt that why people are banned, the general concept? X does something bad so we will do something bad to X so he does not do more bad things
lance ryder wilson votes 1 so i will vote 1 on him so he does not vote 1 anymore
why is it right when staff does it, only? also do you guys realize that it does not seem to work, like, at all
its like
>I WILL PUT PERSON X AT PRISON AND THAT PERSON WONT COMMIT CRIMES"
>COMES OUT OF PRISON WITH HATRED, COMMITS CRIMES
>thinking emooji
the simple fact htis happens shows that it will happen in other cases, it depends on the individual of course, some will and some wont, but it is quite obvious a lot do
the "enjoy my rating" is not a problem, how do you know he doesnt have a valid reason behind that? what if he had but it was in the comment?
in the second case where Yoda Gaming says he would "abuse" the ability, why would he do it? he might be angry you delete comments, he might think the maps are bad and well the envy and revenge thing etc etc etc that must be fixed before this is
the lol comment can be a good reason, maybe he thinks the map is so bad it is ridiculous, why is that invalid?
THE FACT THAT TOP LEVEL EDITORS RANK EXIST DOESNT MEAN ANYTHING, its completely arbitrary, i could verify all plays that are online daily with the search function then create a top ranking based on number of deaths using the php extract thing, and create a ranking, would that mean that grinding deaths is good? THAT IS PURELY SUBJECTIVE AND WHAT IS WORHT AND WHAT IS NOT ALSO IS BECAUSE THE CONCEPT OF WORTH IS PLEASE IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME GO REFUTE THE FOLLOWING:
hayek mises friedman(both) bawerk hoppe rothbard descartes hayek leibniz kant AND A BUNCH OF PEOPLE THAT SAY EXPERIENCE IS SUBJECTIVE WHICH CAN DEDUCE SUBJECTIVE WORTH AND EVERYTHING IS AN OPINION AFTER ALL
including accepting mine so yo ucan say "i feel like youre wrong" but i think its good enought to make most people(who happen to follow reason) think youre ridiculous
But I agree
you dont
that you said it shouldn't be removed
ok
but at least change it a little or at least staff should take action against this when reported.
ok, so we have apples, bananas and pears, i dont like pears, so lets change pears into avocados, or let staff decide when pears are good
YOU ARE REMOVING THE 1 STAR RATE AND THUS REMOVING A PROPERTY OR CHARACTERISTIC THAT DEFINES THE CURRENT RATING SYSTEM AND ACCORDING TO SOME FANCY-ASS LAW BY LEIBNIZ KNOWN AS Identity of Indiscernibles IT IS NOT THE SAME THING though there can be problems in it because of our limited knowledge to define things which just happened but it does not refute that it just makes it impossible to be used in practice but in this case it is obvious that it is true and even if is not we can edit the law so it does by removing the part that might be refuted
so you still disagree with itbut you wont bother reading right?
so i hope eric doesnt read yours
BUT WE ALSO FALL INTO A PROBLEM WHICH IS THAT DISCORD CAN BE EDITED AND HERE IS PROOF
!111!!!!11!!!!1eleven!!!!