If Eric Would Do This

Give us your feedback about PB2.5! Or have an idea? Post it here!

If Eric Would Do This

Postby STEFANO2008 » 19 October 2016, 02:06

i want some things added to 2.5 like-----------an explosion would push you back and hurt you when you bounce ion a wall----added voices instead of text when protagonists talk----52 campaign levels (if possible)----gun colour can be changed----when a rail collides with other rail the 2 rails would go back to the shooter----when a bullet collides with a gun *if someone haves a gun on his hands*the bullet will collide with the gun-------reply if you agree <3

STEFANO2008
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 91
Joined: 20 August 2016, 19:57
Location: The fake Argentina B)

Re: If Eric Would Do This

Postby o_Sniper_o » 19 October 2016, 02:44

I'm pretty sure he's going to be doing all of these anyways. I'm not sure about the voice acting since that might not be within his budget.

One thing that would be great is if he got some of the mappers from the community to help him with the campaign.
Imagine monthly map packs, that further the story and add new content to the game.
(I'd also love to get some SP levels from blade- pls)





PLS PLS PLS
User avatar
o_Sniper_o
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 57
Joined: 16 July 2013, 06:39

Re: If Eric Would Do This

Postby LazyRain » 19 October 2016, 09:05

Offtopic:
STEFANO2008, I begin to think that you can't use "Enter" button. Your post can be read, but it is better if you make the list.
Spoiler: Show More
an explosion would push you back and hurt you when you bounce ion a wall
added voices instead of text when protagonists talk
52 campaign levels (if possible)
gun colour can be changed
when a rail collides with other rail the 2 rails would go back to the shooter
when a bullet collides with a gun *if someone haves a gun on his hands*the bullet will collide with the gun


Ontopic:
1) Already have;
2) More postscoring is mean more work and more weight to the game.
3) Possible. But number of levels depends on the possible size of new levels, length story and the amount of new content.
4) It may be confused, but it would be cool.
5) Hmmm... No, It is not a boomerang. Besides, bullets are too small and numerous to count for them the angle of reflection from other bullets.
6) I'm not sure, but it may be optional.
User avatar
LazyRain
Civil Security Heavy [300]
 
Posts: 323
Joined: 27 January 2015, 08:57
Location: Sofa

Re: If Eric Would Do This

Postby STEFANO2008 » 19 October 2016, 11:42

im separating with a ---- LazyRain are you serious -_-

STEFANO2008
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 91
Joined: 20 August 2016, 19:57
Location: The fake Argentina B)

Re: If Eric Would Do This

Postby o_Sniper_o » 19 October 2016, 21:16

STEFANO2008 wrote:im separating with a ---- LazyRain are you serious -_-


That's autistic and you're lucky that you got two serious replies to your thread. People shouldn't have to put effort into reading something.
User avatar
o_Sniper_o
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 57
Joined: 16 July 2013, 06:39

Re: If Eric Would Do This

Postby GhostX5 » 19 October 2016, 22:02

You said that you want the rail bullet collide with the other one? No way, that's too random. Too random for Eric to do that, because it can be very confusing. Bullet intersections are already implemented, by the way. You're gonna be happy about two rockets are gonna blow up when both collide, insta-explosion.
User avatar
GhostX5
Civil Security Ghost [400]
 
Posts: 424
Joined: 26 July 2016, 07:15
Location: Moon

Re: If Eric Would Do This

Postby STEFANO2008 » 20 October 2016, 01:38

Topic Answered Topic Locked. im locking it right now

STEFANO2008
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 91
Joined: 20 August 2016, 19:57
Location: The fake Argentina B)


Return to Feedback and Insights

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



cron