[REMOVAL REQUEST] Eric Gurt-high

[REMOVAL REQUEST] Eric Gurt-high

Postby yizhe » 26 July 2020, 03:23

A]
- I have read and understand fully the Required Reading for posting a Map Approval Request: YES
- I have read and understand fully the Map Approval Rules: YES
- I have confirmed that this map is currently approved: YES

[B]
- Map Name: High Fight
- Map ID: eric gurt-high
- Link to Map Page: https://www.plazmaburst2.com/?s=9&a=&m= ... &id=244066
- Link to Map Demo: https://www.plazmaburst2.com/?s=2&map=eric gurt-high

[C]
- In a few words, why do you think this map should not be approved?: EG, Outdated, unfair, poor wall arrangement

- In detail, why should the map not be approved?:

1. Levitating walls

2. camp spot in dm especially, where one can spam bloom gun while securing 2 entrance of same direction

https://imgur.com/gallery/yGfFxD4

3. poor wall placement of the steps, making going up easy but not when coming down as ragdoll becomes highly unstable and they tend to fall.

4. Outdated

5. why is there a door here? shouldnt it be a wall?

https://imgur.com/gallery/ZsMv1C3

6.red base is a nice camping spot especially in dm

7. on the far right theres a odd shape structure building. i think that can be improved further.


- Any other comments: Map has great gameplay in the past, but now it is very outdated with poor wall structures and not on par with current map approval standards.
Meep!
User avatar
yizhe
Android T-01187 [200]
 
Posts: 224
Joined: 5 February 2014, 09:26
Location: Advance level editor

Re: [REMOVAL REQUEST] Eric Gurt-high

Postby Stryde » 28 July 2020, 03:08

To point 1: There is one levitating wall, but this appears to be in the same plane as walls tied to base. I personally don't have an issue with this and don't think this, nor any of these other points, warrant a removal or edit request.

To point 2: This is intentionally designed to provide cover on the rooftop of the building.

To point 3: Not totally sure what you mean, but moving up and down the stairs is fluid, there is no random collision where player path becomes hindered due to too high of the next stair.

To point 4: In terms of gameplay movement, this map has better movement than some more recent approved maps. In addition, every spot on this map can be reached while having a weapon equipped. I am unsure how this is outdated.

To points 5, 7: This is an older PB2 map from 2011 and is based somewhat on a campaign level as well. Back then, this was the style of maps and honestly it doesn't disturb map or look bad in any means in this level.

To point 6: this is not an overpowered camp spot since this wall is 30 pixels in width and can be shot through with a pistol or shotgun

In addition to points 2 and 6, this map has 2 HE and 2 port grenades that are able to limit the amount of camping possibilities.

Update: This removal request has been rejected at this time. This topic will be locked.

Stryde
Usurpation Destroyer [350]
 
Posts: 361
Joined: 9 November 2015, 02:17


Return to Removal Requests Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users