phsc wrote:Incompetence wrote:i take it you haven't seen the TKB-059 which is alright. my rendition has the same exact proportions as the original so if if anything looks inconsistent in size, that's how the original was
so youre just tracing over guns like i did like 3 years ago, nice, not even adapting them to fit pb2
lmao not even close because
this doesn't look like
this 100%. nice claim though, i can see why you were called ignorant now.
phsc wrote:i do it in 4k and looks great and thick
congrats. a few pixels difference is literally a negligible nitpick though :^)
phsc wrote:but that just looks weird with the scope, kinda doesnt fit a 2d style
my rendition, my decision. that's the rule in art. the original looked weird enough so this retains that personality
phsc wrote:it just looks retarded, theres no reason to add something like that, advanced stuff is kinda like efficiency in its max, thats kinda the opposite
your opinion. tkb-059 was advanced for its time yet not efficient.
phsc wrote:its a shotgun that doenst look like one, a 10 year old that picks up that weapon isnt going to think of a shotgun, and thats the main public of pb2
tell SRM this, not me. i didn't design that gun lmao
phsc wrote:actually 35 isnt that much if, and the damage values would still be way too big
compare that to the falkok shotgun which is the closest comparison in terms of performance. 35 degrees in comparison to that is more balanced than what that shotgun has atm.
phsc wrote:the magazine could work if it didnt have the trigger guard, BUT YOU CAN RIGHT
sure, let's place the magazine in a place where the trigger guard isn't even close to it (because the stock totally is near the trigger guard) because haha that's how I want it, screw the original design am i right?
take some time to actually look at the m1216. a bullpup setup would involve more than just moving the magazine behind the trigger but w/e, you think you're the expert here lmao
also the magazine works fine. do you think the trigger guard actually goes through the magwell or something?
phsc wrote:oh sure all the pb2 weapons have that and it realy makes a lot of sense
never said all of the weapons had it. can you actually make an attempt responding properly?
sorry i was trying to be somewhat impractical in a game where impracticality defines it ayy lmao
phsc wrote:fits the art style
lmao give it a rest already. just because you think you have the style down doesn't mean you know it 100%. words like this is what forces artists to not be creative and especially not follow their own standards. let ppl approach art how they want to, it's their art and not yours.
phsc wrote:it about the chrome barrel, makes sense irl, but something like the bng really makes a lot of sense, so realism is clearly the key
yes let me compare two radically different things in order to feed my own confirmation bias
unsure if you realized or not but this is a sci-fi game where anything can be realistically justified with the assumption that it's possible. realism clearly isn't the key but it's a catalyst in explaining just about anything you see in the game. there's also modernized weapons that are completely anachronistic so both clearly fits in with that specific weapon archetype. it stands out with the rest of the arsenal but that's the exact point in a weapon in any type of game.
phsc wrote:but i get it that you cant accept feedback
i can take feedback, you just can't give it without letting that edge bleed out of you :^)
ironic though considering you like to ignore people's posts when they reply on your art topics because "i don't agree." acknowledgement =/= agreement. knowing this will help you tenfold in life when you exit the "le edge" stage