Dark Reaver wrote:I didn't even see anyone with the Usurpation Destroyer or Android SLC-56 ranks.
darkstar 1 wrote:Well, I think people will spam or freepost to get a higher rank :/Dark Reaver wrote:I didn't even see anyone with the Usurpation Destroyer or Android SLC-56 ranks.
Well, I would have Android SLC-56 rank, but it does not show thanks to my 'official fan artist' tag :p
lee06400 wrote:I don't think it's good because it invites users to prefer quantity over quality, we should have a ranking system based on something else than just post numbers.
wreak wrote:Yeah but based off of quality means we need something like a point/like system which worked miserably last time we did something like that.
sbilko wrote:Yes, the forum ranks encourage the people to post more. However, when they do, they don't write meaningful posts.
How can we encourage people to write more meaningful posts?
jdc55 wrote:I think their pretty trash imo.. but thats just me.. :/
Krutz wrote:they encourage people to post on the forum, but whether the post is a contribution or not isnt relevant
so someone can post 500 posts that make 0 sense or are just plain stupid and what a legend he becomes, right?
i say you just delete them; id rather see people saying things that bring shit to the table instead of just repeating other points that people have already made or even just saying empty words that mean nothing
sbilko wrote:I think it would be nice to be more creative on the ranks. Im confused at some point by them and think they should be so clear that the number doesnt need to be stated.
wreak wrote:Yeah but based off of quality means we need something like a point/like system which worked miserably last time we did something like that.
guest-electric fish wrote:my opinion about these ranks dear sbillko is that i am neutral which means that from one point i like them because it is like getting promoted but from other point i hate them due they are not much important
sbilko wrote:That is right.
But deleting them would bring us to our initial state, altrought being a viable solution.
Any other ideas?
I think it would be nice to be more creative on the ranks. Im confused at some point by them and think they should be so clear that the number doesnt need to be stated.
Id like to see a new thing implemented; a system where you can "like" another persons response, and the count of total likings of your replies is kept at the place of the now forum ranks. This way it will be proven that the posters with the best answers/popularity are the first.
I think there was a similar system in past.
Krutz wrote:they encourage people to post on the forum, but whether the post is a contribution or not isn't relevant
so someone can post 500 posts that make 0 sense or are just plain stupid and what a legend he becomes, right?
i say you just delete them; id rather see people saying things that bring shit to the table instead of just repeating other points that people have already made or even just saying empty words that mean nothing
lee06400 wrote:I don't think it's good because it invites users to prefer quantity over quality, we should have a ranking system based on something else than just post numbers.
sibilko wrote:Yes, the forum ranks encourage the people to post more. However, when they do, they don't write meaningful posts.
Mirth wrote:Considering how some people post pointless stuff, just to increase that count and their respective rank, I think it's obvious they are pointless, specially for a community where half the people would not handle them responsibly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users