Syluster wrote:it was to bring the community closer together as a family, a big helpful, supportive, & protective family
Syluster wrote:After it was taken down and erased from the site there have been no other way of site social media other than contacting with others in-game.
Syluster wrote:Even "if" there is a new chat the staff needs to be a lot stricter on the rules that supported then they were before but not as much that the D.Q's have to make hateful assertions towards everybody.
Syluster wrote:We had experienced although not everyone has known or beg to differ but important memorable events on chat, such as Staff Promotions, Real World News events, & New Year Celebrations.
Syluster wrote:In conclusion I feel that we should bring the chat back on the site or even if its on fourm I hope that we can be brought back together as a family more importantly as a community.
ivan123bago wrote:We hope the chat will appear in pb2.5 hopefully. The chat is temporary closed due to dramatically emotions :/
assasinguy wrote:Hik, I've read your post, and pretty much everything you said is true, it's depressing to realise that as the truth, but it's true, but despite that, I'd still like to see another chat, as I think we'd be able to control it with a stricter system.
Silent Aurora wrote:Eh, I am pretty sure we (staff) would learn from our past and handle the new chat (if it comes with pb2.5) differently, as said above, more stricter and hopefully with more advance tools and security, there shouldn't be a need to remove it for the 2nd time.
DoomWrath wrote:I think a second type of chat, either onsite, or integral to the multiplayer lobby, would be a great bonus so long as it was built properly, and didn't have the failings of the last chatroom. In a perfect world, the site and chat would have straight email verification for the site, verification for specific features (if the site has none), email address blacklisting, basic IP bans, IP blacklists, ISP blacklisting (used for blocking proxies), account whitelists, etc. Those, coupled with actual tools for the chat, like flagging a user as 'warned' in a similar manner to the forums, an experienced staff team and a closer community (the regulars) willing to act sensibly, would make a second generation chat a pleasant place to be.
Hikarikaze wrote:Silent Aurora wrote:Eh, I am pretty sure we (staff) would learn from our past and handle the new chat (if it comes with pb2.5) differently, as said above, more stricter and hopefully with more advance tools and security, there shouldn't be a need to remove it for the 2nd time.
Even if the current staff does learn from their past, what's the guarantee that any future staff members will act in line towards the new system the chat will be expected to have? There were some good members on the team before and we all saw how they all went down. What's saying that history won't repeat itself?
.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users