BenXShield wrote:It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
And if you have a lite male/female you should be able to fly faster and if you have a heavy male/female your speed should be reduced to a certain amount.
KARL SERG wrote:BenXShield wrote:It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
And if you have a lite male/female you should be able to fly faster and if you have a heavy male/female your speed should be reduced to a certain amount.
That should depend on what Settings are done.
Savxir wrote:I don't want jetpacks. That's what farts are for.
Better to get some information about jetpacks before judging them.BenXShield wrote:It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
What is this sh... thing and how is it related to the topic?BenXShield wrote:I've also drafted my ideas that can be put in effect in 2.5 and players might like this.
http://prntscr.com/95rdd3
I have a feeling that you have no idea what are you talking about.BenXShield wrote:Keeping High Display for 2.5 takes away less of the wall glitches and fall damage, I've noticed that most of my 3 inch death falls occur for me on low display.
This way if Gurt keeps high display then most players will not have to deal with hitbox lag or fall dmge.
However I'm not saying Physics, Effects, Screen Effects, and 60 FPS should be removed I'm just saying that the "glitchier" settings of PB2 should be removed.
Just because someone has a different opinion, doesn't mean he is a retard. If you call someone like that, make sure you have enough evidences to prove that.Civil-Lite wrote:Whoever says no to jetpacks (no offence) would be a retard.
Wouldn't jetpacks decrease camping instead, as the players would be able to fly over camper's cover (in some situations)?eternal titan wrote:Not in Approved Matches since camping and spamming will be increased.
NNC wrote:Just because someone has a different opinion, doesn't mean he is a retard. If you call someone like that, make sure you have enough evidences to prove that.Civil-Lite wrote:Whoever says no to jetpacks (no offence) would be a retard.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users