[Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

General Discussion related to the Plazma Burst game series.

Should PB2.5 have the jet pack feature?

Yes
34
85%
No
6
15%
 
Total votes : 40

[Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby BenXShield » 22 November 2015, 15:50

Recently Eric has posted the first picture of the PB2.5 Jet Pack feature which has been suggested by many people in the community.
What do you think about it?
Eric's Twitter: https://twitter.com/Eric_Gurt

BenXShield
 

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby NNC » 22 November 2015, 16:08

That's too early to judge it.
~~~~
User avatar
NNC
Android T-01187 [200]
 
Posts: 224
Joined: 16 July 2013, 07:18
Location: East Coast Russia

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Silent Aurora » 22 November 2015, 16:51

Ive always been against the idea of jetpacks.
Silent Aurora
User avatar
Silent Aurora
Forum Veteran [1000]
 
Posts: 1213
Joined: 11 December 2013, 18:09
Location: Hika and sks <3

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Wardemption » 22 November 2015, 17:20

I want Deez jetpacks.
freedom's from, not to.
User avatar
Wardemption
Falkok [250]
 
Posts: 289
Joined: 19 December 2014, 02:50
Location: PKR, NP

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Sniper J » 22 November 2015, 17:42

Jet-packs in campaign are fine but not in multiplayer.

Sniper J
Advanced Usurpation Soldier [150]
 
Posts: 162
Joined: 7 December 2014, 03:01
Location: United States

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Savxir » 22 November 2015, 18:36

I don't want jetpacks. That's what farts are for.
User avatar
Savxir
Cyber Grub [25]
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 7 July 2014, 03:13
Location: American Union

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Star Fox McCloud » 22 November 2015, 18:49

I want jetpacks. if no jetpacks, tryhards will return and ruin game 4 new players. jetpack more fun

Star Fox McCloud
Advanced Usurpation Soldier [150]
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 16 July 2013, 00:21

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby guest-electric fish » 22 November 2015, 20:10

jetpacks will make us will feel like James bond
Spoiler: Show More
now the show is over ladies and gentlemen !!!! thanks for being here tonight and i really appriciette your presence so once again thank you very much and have an good night
User avatar
guest-electric fish
Civil Security Heavy [300]
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 6 April 2015, 17:10
Location: Pluto.the cold never bother me anyway

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby KARL SERG » 22 November 2015, 20:13

I hope they won't be allowed for approved Matches by Default so we won't have People saying: "OMG, the [censored] Jetpack propelled me into a [censored] Wall/Ceiling/Floor. They are hard to use, so remove them!!1!111one!1"

It might be funny to see skrubs colliding with Walls.
User avatar
KARL SERG
Civil Security Ghost [400]
 
Posts: 421
Joined: 17 July 2013, 12:01
Location: Romanian Oligarchic Republic

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Venemous » 22 November 2015, 20:31

I want them to be more customizable, mostly being able to restrict the directions to only up/left/right/down/etc, since Eric said that it could go in any direction which could be disastrous for some maps.
MAPMAKER'S TOOLKIT v1.3
Last update: August 27 2018

http://www.plazmaburst2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=134&t=21832
User avatar
Venemous
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 76
Joined: 16 November 2013, 02:33

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby BenXShield » 22 November 2015, 21:50

It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
And if you have a lite male/female you should be able to fly faster and if you have a heavy male/female your speed should be reduced to a certain amount.

BenXShield
 

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby KARL SERG » 22 November 2015, 21:54

BenXShield wrote:It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
And if you have a lite male/female you should be able to fly faster and if you have a heavy male/female your speed should be reduced to a certain amount.


That should depend on what Settings are done.
User avatar
KARL SERG
Civil Security Ghost [400]
 
Posts: 421
Joined: 17 July 2013, 12:01
Location: Romanian Oligarchic Republic

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby BenXShield » 22 November 2015, 21:58

I've also drafted my ideas that can be put in effect in 2.5 and players might like this.
http://prntscr.com/95rdd3

KARL SERG wrote:
BenXShield wrote:It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
And if you have a lite male/female you should be able to fly faster and if you have a heavy male/female your speed should be reduced to a certain amount.


That should depend on what Settings are done.


Yeah, I've been urging this push that 2.5 only involves High Display which is the "graphicer" setting of PB2
Most of the pictures I have seen from Gurt are on High Display.
Keeping High Display for 2.5 takes away less of the wall glitches and fall damage, I've noticed that most of my 3 inch death falls occur for me on low display.
This way if Gurt keeps high display then most players will not have to deal with hitbox lag or fall dmge.
However I'm not saying Physics, Effects, Screen Effects, and 60 FPS should be removed I'm just saying that the "glitchier" settings of PB2 should be removed.
I feel like I'm going off topic XD
Last edited by Silent Aurora on 23 November 2015, 08:20, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Double Posting

BenXShield
 

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby maxim12 » 22 November 2015, 22:11

Ofcourse It's good!

I have no idea why everyone else cry for not adding jetpack to the game, because "They're having fun wrong!!!1!11eleven!!1" crowd...

maxim12
Civil Security Ghost [400]
 
Posts: 431
Joined: 16 July 2013, 20:56
Location: Israel, Haifa.

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Civil-Lite » 22 November 2015, 22:48

Savxir wrote:I don't want jetpacks. That's what farts are for.


Whoever says no to jetpacks (no offence) would be a retard. I want jetpacks so bad it would be used for quick getaways 8) . I would instantly knock em out in PB2! Add those jetpacks in PB2.5 right away!!! It would be a lot of uses!! Make us happy Eric Hurt, JUST DO IT :D !!!!!
"Sup forever alone. Do you want to do something alive or are you just gonna sit down on your a** all day like a loser? It's simple, so just go on by and play Plazma Burst 2. Well easy!"

"Ah... Son of a..."
User avatar
Civil-Lite
Janitor
 
Posts: 557
Joined: 30 January 2015, 02:44
Location: Searching your feelings...

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby Silent Aurora » 23 November 2015, 08:22

Ben, avoid double posting. Use the edit button next time if no one replies.
Silent Aurora
User avatar
Silent Aurora
Forum Veteran [1000]
 
Posts: 1213
Joined: 11 December 2013, 18:09
Location: Hika and sks <3

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby FRC10 » 23 November 2015, 09:49

Jet pack not a bad idea at all....after all we all want to have a game with tons of fun. :D
"Nobody is born legend but you can grow into one."
https://pb2kzm.wordpress.com
User avatar
FRC10
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 95
Joined: 1 August 2015, 10:40

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby eternal titan » 23 November 2015, 10:58

Not in Approved Matches since camping and spamming will be increased. I don't want to Imagine a guy flying and spraying bullets everywhere. Although, I'm fine with it on custom maps (New flying maps maybe :?)
User avatar
eternal titan
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 51
Joined: 10 December 2014, 15:55
Location: Earth #NotaAlien

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby NNC » 23 November 2015, 11:50

BenXShield wrote:It should definitely have a fuel bar. It should be at least 50
Better to get some information about jetpacks before judging them.

BenXShield wrote:I've also drafted my ideas that can be put in effect in 2.5 and players might like this.
http://prntscr.com/95rdd3
What is this sh... thing and how is it related to the topic?

BenXShield wrote:Keeping High Display for 2.5 takes away less of the wall glitches and fall damage, I've noticed that most of my 3 inch death falls occur for me on low display.
This way if Gurt keeps high display then most players will not have to deal with hitbox lag or fall dmge.
However I'm not saying Physics, Effects, Screen Effects, and 60 FPS should be removed I'm just saying that the "glitchier" settings of PB2 should be removed.
I have a feeling that you have no idea what are you talking about.

Civil-Lite wrote:Whoever says no to jetpacks (no offence) would be a retard.
Just because someone has a different opinion, doesn't mean he is a retard. If you call someone like that, make sure you have enough evidences to prove that.

eternal titan wrote:Not in Approved Matches since camping and spamming will be increased.
Wouldn't jetpacks decrease camping instead, as the players would be able to fly over camper's cover (in some situations)?
~~~~
User avatar
NNC
Android T-01187 [200]
 
Posts: 224
Joined: 16 July 2013, 07:18
Location: East Coast Russia

Re: [Poll] Jet Pack feature for 2.5 | Is it good or bad?

Postby maxim12 » 23 November 2015, 13:39

NNC wrote:
Civil-Lite wrote:Whoever says no to jetpacks (no offence) would be a retard.
Just because someone has a different opinion, doesn't mean he is a retard. If you call someone like that, make sure you have enough evidences to prove that.


He has a point, i see no reason why not putting jetpacks. What, because of "Others having fun In teh wrong way!!!1!!1eleven" thing?

Dont want to play with jetpacks? Dont play with them, SIMPLE AS THAT.

And it would give new gameplay, they also should know that there are maps that does not have jetpacks, so they can play them, and could be a solution on removing jetpacks from approved maps and keep them only on custom and singleplayer, but I'm sure jetpacks would be good and fun to have in approved maps too.

All who say they dont want jetpacks are just crybabies, neither that "Others having fun In teh wrong way!!!1!!1eleven" crowd or because they dont want to accept to be killed by someone who is using jetpack.

maxim12
Civil Security Ghost [400]
 
Posts: 431
Joined: 16 July 2013, 20:56
Location: Israel, Haifa.

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users